Once I have had the opportunity to read the poverty in Scotland 2022. I will write a blog on what poverty in Scotland means for the Human Rights (Scotland) Bill/Act.
I will up date the Human Rights page on this site so all blogs on Human Rights are in one place. Not too sure why I have not done this before now.
Also this is my first blog post/ snippet from my phone. Not sure how it will look on a desktop.
I joined the SNP in 2007. I joined for the same reason most people join a political party, the party’s vision, values, and, principles. To this date I still believe Scotland could and should be an independent country.
For years I pounded the streets, delivered leaflets, chapped doors, stood at polling stations, and, even became an unpaid call centre worker (only for campaigns). Today, however, I have given up my activism. Activism is for the young and the committed. Am nether.
I remember my first SNP conference in 2007/08 Alex Salmond, said something like “I heard a rumour. I think we win the election”. I grinned, like a child in a toy shop. I worked hard to win that election. I worked just as hard for years after that. I attended annual conferences, councils and branch meetings. I even joined a community council and community reference group, in the hope of becoming an SNP councillor.
By 2011 though the highlight of the national conference, was the fringe events. Talking to my third-sector colleagues. And, finding out more about the wider sector. From 2011, forward, keynote speeches had become like a pantomime to see who could do the best impression of Bill Murray, in the movie groundhog day. I could have given most of the speeches myself. All that would have been required was to plagiarise last year’s speech. I was done. Burnout is real.
I decided to focus on my third-sector work (voluntary). While returning to university to do my second undergraduate degree. I returned briefly to activism for cameos in the Scottish Independence referendum-2014. And the Referendum to leave the European Union-2016. Cameos’ is all they were. By 2017 I had- note, the choice of the word had- given up on party politics. I wanted no part of the civil war. A civil war that takes place on my Facebook feed daily. Things could be so different if either the 2014 or 2016 vote had gone differently.
I was out of party politics (though still hold membership). I was on the people-powered health and well-being reference group. Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland’s interface to The Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act and Inclusion Scotland’s sub-board on policy. By 2018 I was one module away from completing my Politics, Philosophy and Economics undergraduate degree at the Open University. When the opportunity to work on a community development programme in South Africa came up, I jumped at the chance. The jigsaw was almost complete all I had to do was pass DD309 Doing Economics. When it comes to Doing Economics Truss me not Liz.
I just opened book one. Can you guess what the first topic is of DD309: Doing Economics? You really cannot make this up. The first topic in book one of DD309: Doing Economics, is Market liberalisation, inequality and financial crisis. If Liz Truss wants my copy of DD309: Doing Economics she can have it. though she no longer requires it, does she?
Upon completing my BA (Hons) in Politics, Philosophy and Economics at the Open University I had a strange desire to do a Masters’s degree. The MSc in Social Innovation looked to be a perfect choice. Glasgow Caledonian University was my first University back in 2001. Returning in 2019 was like a homecoming for me. And on completion of my MSc in 2021, I became a real alumnus. With all the powers and responsibilities that go with being an alumnus. There is one very small problem though. It is 2022, almost 2023 and I have still not used any of my knowledge and experience to achieve meaningful work. Yes, my colleague and I are working on setting up a social enterprise. A-LEAF is still nothing more than a detailed plan. And that brings me to the conundrum I face on Thursday 20 October 2022.
By definition, companies limited by guarantee must be apolitical. The funny thing is when I woke up this morning. This thought never entered my head. I have the shambolic state affairs at Westminster for planting this seed of thought in my head. At 14:25 on 20 October 2022, I received an email from my SNP branch organiser, the email was a call for activists As I said above I gave up on activism, and am burned out. Additionally, A-LEAF’s principles, values and, vision is to empower the most marginalised citizens in Scottish communities.
Can I be considering putting my black a yellow rosette back on after everything I said in this blog? I think I am. However, as a co-founding member of A-LEAF, an apolitical social enterprise. There must be a conflict of interest. Yes, there is. A large conflict of interest. Here is the thing though, if I am to come off the political party bench. It will be to fight for a first-team place. What does that mean for A-LEAF? The wider question is: are my principles comparable with party politics anymore?
I caught a bit of BBC question time. The impression I got from the panel, is not one person is willing to take any leadership responsibility . As I said to a friend in the gym today. Yes, I have studied DD209-Running the Economy and DD309- Doing Economics, I still consider my knowledge, basic.
[T]he inadequacy of policy is something that should bother economists greatly … For times of crisis are when economists are most needed. If they cannot get their advice accepted in the clinch – or, worse yet, if they have no useful advice to offer – the whole enterprise of economic scholarship has failed in its most essential duty
And that is, of course, what has just happened [with the crisis starting in 2008]
Krugman, 2012 cited in Santos & Wuyts 2013, p.5
It looks to me. Someone with a basic understanding of economics. That what we should do- when I say “we”, I mean the shambolic Tory Government. Is to appoint a PM with a basic understanding of economics. If you cannot find someone in the House of Commons. Find someone in the House of Lords. At least one Lord will work for their £300 a day pay.
On reflection on today’s events, the question I need to ask myself is. What is the most important thing to me, having the ability to influence Government policy from the outside- as part of the third sector. Or from the inside as an SNP activist and a paid member of the Government? I guess the final question I should ask the UK and Scottish Government ministers, is this. Are the third and fourth sectors sustainable?
If the economic answer is no, the Third and Fourth sectors are not sustainable. Then surely the apolitical is political policy.
First things first I would like to thank Dirty Sci-Fi Buddha for liking the introduction. You can find Dirty Sci-Fi Buddha here.
This is not my first post about legitimacy. You can read my first post on legitimacy here. Will legitimacy blog one was about me trying to convince the reader that I have legitimacy, to talk about the self. Due to studying the self as part of my A222 Exploring philosophy and reading synaptic self by Joseph LeDoux.
Blog post two on legitimacy is me asking the reader for the go-ahead to try and write my book. I do not have a clue what I would write about. As I said in the first blog regarding legitimacy. When I try talking about the self and identity. All I receive from people is a look of total confusion. Which is normally followed by “don’t talk nonsense”. For that reason The self: a journey to find me. Shall not be the title of the book.
Perhaps my book could focus on the meaning of life. I have the Philosophy of Religion as a starting point. Or I could write a book on Making Sustainability Work in Scotland: How I run a Social Enterprise. I like that. At this point, A-LEAF is still a work of fiction. So for now the book will remain on the shelf.
To the readers will you give me the legitimacy to write the book, when the time comes. At the end of the day, if you don’t buy it. there is no legitimacy in what I say. People are given power because people follow.
Will you follow a 39-year-old white male, who was diagnosed with a medulloblastoma aged four? Who today has too much knowledge, with no one to listen.
Providing you have viewed other areas of this website, you should already know numerous things about me. For example, you should know I had a brain tumour at the age of four. You should also know that I had a stroke around that age. What you may not know, unless you have had the opportunity to read my older blogs on blogger, is I was almost denied entry into mainstream education because I could not walk a plank. Yes, You did read that correctly. Today I have two undergraduate degrees. One is Multimedia technology. Comes in useful when designing WordPress websites. And a second in Politics, philosophy, and economics (PPE). My PPE undergraduate degree, well that comes in useful for navigating society. I also have a master of science in social innovation. And, if it was not for my MSc I would not have considered setting up A-LEAF, this website would not exist. More importantly, however, I would not be considering writing a book and would not seek your feedback on the concept.
Prudently I inform the readers that this is not my first rodeo with the concept of writing a book. This, however, is no book. It is more of a plan, do, study, act project to see if anyone reads what I write.
Given that September (when writing) is, Self-Management month, how do you self-manage the stress of contemporary living?
I wrote the paragraph above last month. As you may have guessed it is October. October 18th. Today I can inform my readers, that with a little luck and a lot of hard work my social enterprise will be launching very soon.
Should the book, if I write one focus on why I chose to start a social enterprise? Or perhaps the inequality story by David M Howie. Yes, that was a lord of The Rings nod.
I’ll use this section of the ‘road walked’ page to give short updates from the roadside
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation have issued their annual ‘Poverty in Scotland’ report for 2022. The report highlights the continuing impact f poverty in Scotland and has recommendations for the UK government on benefits and for the Scottish Government on making a one-off payment to Scottish Child Payment and Council Tax Reduction recipients. Additionally, all public […]
Poverty in Scotland
I’ll read the poverty in Scotland report for 2022 tomorrow and provided my thoughts in my next blog.
Five ambitions and ninety-three actions. The Scottish Government’s plans were enthusiastic. ‘A Fairer Scotland For Disabled People’ was a six-year plan, that supported and still supports today the needs of disabled people in Scotland. However, the question that now requires an answer: Is the Human Rights Scotland bill an addition to the Scottish Government’s plans from 2016. Or is the Human Rights Scotland bill a direct reaction to external shocks? If the answer to the question is the latter. And, the evidence from the Scottish Government’s Lived experience board suggests some of the Ninety-three actions have not resulted in the outcome desired. Can we as citizens of Scotland say with dedication the Human Rights Scotland bill will bring about A Fairer Scotland for All Scottish Citizens?
As I member of the Scottish Government’s human rights lived experience board I am obligated to attend meetings. there is no obligation on me to write this blog. I write this blog for three reasons. The egotistical reason. Blog posts get more views than the pages on my website. Additionally, I want to get onto the Glasgow Social Enterprise board. I would also like to start my Non-executive board training and get onto a commercial commission/board.
The altruistic reason. Am more altruistic than most people, therefore it should surprise no one to learn I write this post to help others. I write this blog to help equality officers. I write this blog to help the Scottish Government bill team. Finally, I write this blog to help Scottish citizens understand their Human Rights.
Finally, I write this blog because I can. I have the right to do so.
A Fairer Scotland. Are you sure?
[Covid19] and its outcomes did not of themselves create iequallties, but rather they exacerbated the structural inequalities and intersecting oppressions of discrimination and disadvantage on grounds of sex and gander, race and ethic origin, disabity and poverty
O’Hagan, 2021.
I do not apologise for the long quote. Angela O’Hagan was my Human Rights and Gender development lecturer. You may not be shocked to learn I agree completely with the quote. The conundrum is if ‘A Fairer Scotland For Disabled People was the Scottish Government’s plan for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to be incorporated into Scots law. How can the DWP report in 2019 that the number of disabled people living in poverty rose by 200,000 in one year? (Pring, 2019).
Poverty in Scotland 2021 Towards 2030 without poverty has a chapter on the experience of living in poverty, what though is the point of ‘Lived experience’ if things do not improve? Or as Pring writes, things get worse.
Has the Scottish Government failed to live up to its own standards set out in A fairer Scotland for disabled people?
the remainder of the tweet reads. If so can all the failures be blamed on Westminster and the Tories?
Poverty in Scotland 2021 says A Fairer Scotland For Disabled People as a plan runs til 2030. Yes, some parts do. However, I still have the right to be critical when the outcomes of the actions have come up short.
There are Five ambitions and Ninety-three actions in A Fairer Scotland For Disabled People. I will not analyse all Ninety-three of them. I am sure you are glad to hear this. There is no need to. There is a general concurrence across civil society to suggest, to empower, citizens to have Human Rights. All citizens must have dignity. Professor Alan Miller the Scottish Government’s adviser on Human Rights articulated this point this morning (13/10/21) at #BeingHuman22- a Health and Social Care Academy event.
Let us try something, Just for fun. vote in the poll below. let’s see what my readers think.
I was wanting to take the five ambitions and give feedback based on google search results. The problem is a basic google search does not provide enough quality new reports. And am not researching for a PhD in Human Rights. Using grounded theory. Unless you want to pay me.
Instead let us keep the interactive activities going read the ambitions and give it a thumbs up or down, depending on your subjective view.
remember the ambitions are for disabled people. So do/take part in the five questions below?
Support services that promote independent living. meet needs and work together to enable a life of choices, opportunities and participation.
Decent incomes and fairer working lives
Places that are accessible to everyone
Protected rights. Do you know what your rights are?
Active participation. Disabled people can participate as active citizens
this section was completely unplanned. I’ve never tried anything like this. it will be interesting to see what happens.
What I will NOT do in this section. I shall not discuss the peripheries-devolved nations (Scotland, Walse, NI) and the centre-Westminister. What I shall do is discuss the peripheries- communities/citizens and the centre- The Scottish Government. In Scotland, as in all western nations, The Scottish Government passes acts of parliament to change the laws of the land. This type of approach is known as top-down. It works a little better than trickle-down economics but not so much better. In case the reader missed the political sense of humour. Am saying both trickle-down economics and top-down governments do not work. Or both are less effective than their counterparts.
I had not planned on having a section regarding power in this post. However, It was brought up in Alan Miller’s talk. It is a really important point not just for disabled citizens but for all citizens. I now wish I had not given my Open University politics books away.
I would like nothing more than to write about the social contract- by Jean-Jacques Rousseau or a theory of justice-John Rawls. I think readers would be put off for life. Instead, let us simplify it and say, The Human Rights (Scotland) Act would bring about a charter of rights. A charter of rights would give Scottish
citizens a document from which to identify their civil/political and economic/cultural rights.
The Human Rights (Scotland) Act 202…? will change the power dynamics in Scotland. instead of the top-down approach, we have at present The Human Rights (Scotland) Act shall be the enabler for the bottom-up approach to government.
In Scotland at present third sector organisations act as a second chamber to the Scottish parliament. Once the Human Rights (Scotland) act is passed third sector organisations will be required to take on the balance and check role. Some third-sector organisations’ do this presently. in other blogs, I have
called third-sector organisations that do this, civil servants by proxy. Once the Human Rights (Scotland) act become law, an additional number of third-sector organisations will be required to take on the civil servant role. The difference between the post-publication of The Human Rights (Scotland) act and now
is that the people of Scotland will provide legitimacy to the third-sector organisations.
While third-sector sector organisations shall hold legitimacy to hold the Scottish Government and Scottish parliament to account. The citizens of Scotland must also have the legitimacy to hold third-sector organisations accountable.
At present, the Scottish Government and parliament hold the power. Post-Human Rights (Scotland) act the people of Scotland will hold power. As it should be. The people of Scotland are sovereign.
note I could be completely incorrect about this. Am basing what I said on Alan Miller’s talk and months of meeting with the Scottish Governments Human Rights bill team as a lived experience board member.
On the idea of Human Rights as a progressive road map to a fairer Scotland. I want to say something about drug and alcohol misuse. Professor Alan Miller is the chair of the Scottish Government’s task force on drug and alcohol reduction. Professor Miller takes the view that focusing on providing dignity will empower citizens, increase well-being and reduce drug and alcohol misuse. I agree with Alan here. This is the approach A-LEAF is taking as we look to build community empowerment.
I am still 100 per cent in agreement with Porfessor Alan Miller. finding a way to give Scottish citizens back their dignity is how society builds a fairer, healthier Scotland. Professor Carol Emslie and colleagues at Glasgow Caledonian University’s School of Health and Life Sciences, however, instigates an interesting addition to the question this blog post asks.
Is it possible to have a Human Rights (Scotland) Act without having a chapter on gender equality?
Can Scotland be fairer for disabled people, if gender is not considered?
the link to register for the webinar (click) here
To conclude this section. In case it is not clear. In Scotland, at the moment the Scottish Government/ parliament have the power. The Human Rights (Scotland) Act will give more power to the people that live here in Scotland.
I note. Any power that is transferred from the Scottish Government to the people living in Scotland via The Human Rights (Scotland) Act will be subject to devolved powers only.
This blog post has a triple bottom line. As a result, it has taken a different style from my other posts. Can readers please let me know which style is preferred? The title of the post: Is Scotland Fairer For Disabled People Today?, was chosen becuse as Angela O’Hagan’s introduction to Poverty in Scotland 2021: Towards A 2030 Without Poverty reveals Scotland is not a fairer place for a lot of people today.
I want to shine light on one action which I would suggest has completely failed
[The Scottish Government] will empower disabled people to know and claim their rights: following the changes in the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 2015 by promoting independent advocacy and advance statments, alongside a right-based approch in the statutory guidance on the use of mental health legislation to be in place in 2017
action 15. page 14, A Fairer Scotland For Disabled People
I say action 15 has failed not because of media stories. I I say action 15 has failed because of primary data from the Scottish Governments Human Rights lived experience board.
That brings me to the first reason for wanting to write this blog. I wanted to reflect on my time on the lived experience board, and what in anyway my experience has shaped the purpose, values and vision of A-LEAF. I do not think the lived experience on the board has shaped my purpose, values and vision. which are A-LEAF’s purpose, values and vision.
The second reason for wanting to write this blog was to have documentation on what I have been doing since completing my MSc in 2021. In a way I am trying to convice myself that the opportunity cost would not have provided me with the same if not more subjective well-being.
That brings me to the last reason for writing this blog. I want it to help someone. If only one reader is helped by reading this blog then my choice of staying on the lived experience board and working towards registering A-LEAF will be correct.
One last thought on the title/question. Is Scotland fairer for disabled people today? My conclusion is no. that said the Scottish Government could have quantitative data that says I am incorrect, Scotland is fairer for disabled people today. I can only base my conlusion on the qualiative data I have from the lived experience board and from meetings with third sector colleagues.
A fairer Scotland for disabled people was the Scottish Government’s delivery plan to 2021 for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. Do I think the delivery plan went to plan? No I do not. Covid19 may have had a hand in that. However, The Scottish Government cannot hide behind Covid19. As Angela said in the intorduction to poverty in Scotland 2021
[Covid19] and its outcomes did not of themselves create iequallties, but rather they exacerbated the structural inequalities and intersecting oppressions of discrimination and disadvantage on grounds of sex and gander, race and ethic origin, disabity and poverty.
O’Hagan, 2021.
Am sure Professor Carol Emslie and Professor Alan Miller would agree with Professor Angela O’Hagan. I know I do.
Hope is a strong emotion. Hope can guide you into the light, when on a dark path. Hope can provide strength when society demands weakness. Hope is your lighthouse. Hope, is what humans do when we can no longer dream. A dream is to believe. Hope is to believe in faith.
I support my legs, and, my legs support me.
nuknowing quote
the quote/saying above is my faith. No one is better than you to shape your future. In a past blog. I said something like:
Only you can self-manage your conditions, medical or not. I will reach out with open arms in the light but you must take the steps towards the light.
Light, hope, faith. What? For the Open University module A2222 Exploring Philosophy, I was required to write a paper on the philosophy of Religion.
God: the supreme personal being existing beyond the world, creator and ruler of the universe
Religion: a system of belief in and worship of a supernatural, power or god.
Timothy Chappell, 2011, p.8
What is the link between God, Religion, hope, light, and, faith, and contemporary living? A lot. And, nothing. For that same A222 Exploring philosophy module I also had to write a paper on Political Philosophy. As it is political, party conference month I thought I should reflect on our obligation to respect the laws of the state.
Socrates: Leave me then, Crito, to fulfil the will of God, and to follow whither he leads
Our Obligation to Respect the Laws of the State: Plato Crito, Western Philosophy an anthology, 2015, p.626
Am I recommending the state be followed in the same way Socrates would have followed god? No. No, am not. What am recommending is the State should be followed until the point is reached where citizens of the state can no longer dream. What I am recommending to the reader. Is, find your light. and do all you can to hold on to it. Your light. Your principles, values, and, vision are the groundwork for your political philosophy. Remember though the light is not fixed in place.
I become a member of the SNP on, 17 April 2007. To this date, I remain a member of the Glasgow Shettleston branch.
I do not, however, go to branch meetings. Or conferences.
Why? Because the “benefits of greater equality are very widespread” (Wilkinson and Pickett, 2009, p.177).
Am not saying there is, wealth inequality in membership income (most likely is). Am saying I liked the party when after a day of meetings you could have a drink with the cabinet minister in The Royal George Hotel bar.
I was asked not so long ago by a manager, of the charity Who Cares? Scotland. Is starting a social enterprise, something I really wish to do,
given my political/policy background. Am sure my answer was Yes am 100+10 per cent committed to A-LEAF (my social enterprise).
On reflection, I really should have said am want to start A-LEAF to push a political and policy agenda. A-LEAF is apolitical, it will always remain so. Ben Fredman & Craig Carey authors of 4Th Sector Entrepreneurship say a social enterprise’s principles, values, and, vision, are, shaped by the lived experience of their owners.
However, I take the view that the thinking and actions of the owner are shaped by the social enterprise. let me explain A-LEAF’s, vision is that every citizen in society should have dignity. My personal view and the view of the state on Assisted Dying. For the lack of a better word, is, it is wrong. However, dignity must also come in death. Therefore, I have no choice, I have to agree with Scottish Humanists, assisted Dying should be the choice of individual citizens.
As a member of a political party. Or a third-sector organisation I cannot change the parties/organisation’s policy as fast as I can change my mind or amend A-LEAF’s vision. A-LEAF’s vision, values, and, principles are our hopes for citizens and communities in Scotland. I wish to dream not only hope. By walking into the light with A-LEAF I can do just that.
As citizens of societies across the UK. We all need to have hope. Hope for a better tomorrow. We cannot only hope, we must dream. Political parties and political philosophy are not God. Have faith in yourself, in your ideas. Stand up, say and do what makes you happy. Join a community which has your vision, values, and, principles. When your values, and, principles change. Change your community(s).
For me, my vision, values, and, principles are in the fourth sector or social enterprise sector. If yours is in the third sector or political sector, fantastic. Do what makes you happy. please though, do not follow in blind faith.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in aspirit of [personhood}
artical one UN Convention on Human Right
The problem is, the United Nations soft law is no more use than the bible when it comes to providing citizens with dignity and rights. There have been more add-ons to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Then acknowledgements from the UK Government that trickle-down economics just does not work. Where are my Human Rights? Perhaps the title of this blog could have been “[did] the free market revolution” (Benerria, 2003, p.3) steel my Human rights? As Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett (2009, p.262) point out “… profit would still lead companies to act in anti-social ways”. While anti-social is in opposition to social enterprise. It is not a breach of Human Rights. Since February 2022 I have been a member of the Scottish Government’s Human rights bill lived experience board. Why? Why am I a board member of the Scottish Government’s Human rights bill lived experience board? Noted above, I make it clear, that the free market is not the cause of Human Rights violations. If I am not a board member of the Scottish Government’s Human rights bill lived experience board to correct the wrongs of the free market. Then I must be on the Scottish Government’s Human rights bill lived experience board to correct the failures of the public sector. There is an add-on question that is outwith the scope of this blog. Is it not the job of the third sector to look after the failures of the public sector?
In 1973 the world economy had become reliant on oil and was facing raw material shortages that were pushing up prices (Banerjee & Duflo 2010, p.146). Not too much has changed. Has it? At this time I what the reader to think about economic and social rights.
If unpaid activities were valued [1995 prices] at prevailing wages, they would [have] amounted to $16 trillion or about 70 per cent of total world output (Beneria, 2003 p.74)
Gender, Development and Globazation
What sex in society is likely to do unpaid activities? Women. Think about that, not only is the contemporary cost of living crisis an infringement on economic and social rights. It is also an infringement on gender development. At today’s meeting on Disabled people and unpaid carers with third-sector colleagues’, there was a consensus that the cost of living was in breach of economic and social rights. I add here that due to the majority of unpaid carers having xx chromosomes. Women more than men are likely to be hit harder and are more likely to have their human rights violated due to the cost of living crises.
There was also an agreement that the support offered by governments, is not enough to cover the cost of living rises. The view that government support lacks the requirements to mitigate the cost of living crises is supported by The Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland. Who recommended the Scottish Government increase payments to Scottish citizens receving benefits. Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland note there are groups in society, which their recommendations will not help.
As I pointed out in the afternoon’s meeting, additional payments to disabled people and unpaid carers’ is the ethical thing to do.
As one of my co-workers said at today’s meeting ” [citizens’]’ health is affected [by this cost of living increase]. However, as pointed out in yesterday’s Human Rights meeting by John (not real name) “as someone born in 2002, all I’ve known is crises. If this is how our young people are feeling. Society has a mental health pandemic coming.
I started this section with the heading the rights to and the rights from. As a citizen of Scotland, you have the right to a fair trial. the right to housing, the right to live in the community, and, the right to food. this post would be longer than my dissertation if I was to go over all the rights.
the short answer. By the end of the parliamentary session. Why not sooner? Well… the Scottish Government are trying to incorporate four international treaties into Scot law. The Government needs to get the bill/act correct, let us give them some time to do just that. As the Scottish government’s civil servant said yesterday
the delay gives more time to get the bill correct
Scottish Government Civil Servant
I have notes for three meetings. I could have written a PhD paper with the quotes I wrote down. However, I want to get this blog published tonight- October 06. I also know that The Scottish Human Rights Commission. The Health and Social care Alliance Scotland. And many other third-sector partners shall publish better blogs and posts than I could write in a few hours. Saving me time, and providing me more sleeping time.
Am going to do something you should never do. Am going to introduce a new topic in the conclusion. What is next for the Scottish Human Rights bill? I have it on good authority the next meeting will be on monitoring. How will we know if the Human Rights Bill is working?
I have a few ideas, however, I would like to hear the reader’s thoughts in the comments.
David M Howie 